Species details

Brown webcap

Cortinarius brunneus

Inedible
Brown webcap – Cortinarius brunneus

Photo: Dick Culbert from Gibsons, B.C., Canada · CC BY 2.0 · Photo source · License

Description

A dark brown to chestnut webcap with a hygrophanous cap, relatively widely spaced brown gills and a brownish stem.

Identification features

The young cap is bell-shaped to conical, later convex or flatter, dark brown when moist and paler when dry. The stem is slender to club-shaped with fibrous veil remnants; the spore print is rusty brown.

Identification checklist

Check the hygrophanous dark-brown cap, spaced brownish gills, slender-to-clavate stem with fibrous zones and rusty-brown spore print. Species-level identification in this group often needs microscopic characters.

Detailed features

Cap
A dark-brown to chestnut webcap with a hygrophanous cap, rather widely spaced brown gills and a brownish stem.
Hymenophore
The gills are brown and rather widely spaced; the spore print is rusty-brown.
Stem
The stem is slender to club-shaped with fibrous veil remnants; the spore print is rusty brown.
Flesh
Brownish to grey-brown and relatively thin.
Smell
The smell is not distinctive enough for reliable identification.
Spore print
Rust-brown.

Habitat

Mycorrhizal mainly in moist coniferous and mixed woodland, often with spruce and pine; summer and autumn.

Fruiting period

July, August, September, October

Ecology

Trophic mode
Mycorrhizal
Host trees
Spruce (Picea), Pine (Pinus)
Substrate
Forest soil
Soil
Moist
Notes
Mycorrhizal species. Mycorrhizal mainly in moist coniferous and mixed woodland, often with spruce and pine; summer and autumn.

How to separate similar species

Many brown webcaps are extremely similar. Photographs lacking gills, stem, base, habitat and mature spore colour are insufficient for reliable identification.

Similar species

  • Cortinarius glandicolor
  • Cortinarius obtusus
  • Cortinarius species

Interesting facts

Did you know? The hygrophanous cap changes colour markedly with moisture, so colour alone is not reliable.

Extended-description sources